Marc Roche on "The Harry case": "Meghan Markle filled all the boxes to be hated by tabloids"

Marc Roche on "The Harry case": "Meghan Markle filled all the boxes to be hated by tabloids"
People et royauté

The Duke of Sussex mistreated the British monarchy and agitates public opinion.There was this interview with his wife on March 7 at Oprah Winfrey on the American channel CBS.Exchange that made a lot of attention.Recently, he was still engaged, criticizing the education that his father would have given him, comparing life in the palace in the wake to that of a zoo or a giant reality TV.Harry on the Divan, it's Shakespeare in Buckingham.

A few weeks before his visit to Great Britain, zoom in on the profile of a 36-year-old post-adolescent, 6th in the order of succession to the throne and who launches a challenge to the "firm".Institutional perhaps, family too, the two being necessarily linked as Marc Roche, writer, journalist, evening and point correspondent in London (*) confirms us (*).

"I'm going to make sure to break the cycle," said Harry, a bit boastful, on May 13 in the American podcast "Armchair Expert", presented by the actor Dax Shepard.Harry spoke, among other things, about the education of Prince Charles."There is no one to blame.I think nobody should be pointed out.Regarding parenthood, I felt a certain form of pain and suffering because of the pain and the suffering from which my father or my parents may have suffered themselves.I will make sure to break this cycle so as not to transmit it."It is now a habit or almost for the British - and the rest of the world, knowing that Buckingham fascinates more than any other monarchy.After the smoking blows of his interview with Oprah Winfrey, Harry, the “rebel prince»», denigrates in virtual mode the life of palaces in London.He cheerfully compares it to "a mixture between The Truman Show and a life in a zoo".After having aroused what the world in particular described as "toxic communication war" within the British monarchy, the grandson of Elizabeth II persists and signs.In a bit of a bit "damn blood but that is of course", the prince thus justified his late awareness as for the paternal youth."Suddenly, I started to reconstruct everything:" Ok, that's where he went to school.I know that of his life.I also know that this is linked to his parents, which means that he treats me as he was treated.How can we change this for my children?I moved with my whole family in the United States.It was not the plan.But sometimes you must make decisions and give priority to your family and your mental health."Harry also indicates that" the therapy helped him "get out of the sand" and made him realize that he should use his privileged position to help others.

Lire aussi > L’entourage de la reine gronde pour que Harry et Meghan perdent leurs titres au plus viteDerrière ces déclarations parfois ronflantes, souvent iconoclastes, on décèle chez Harry, au-delà du trauma familial pur, une spontanéité un brin casse-gueule Ce ne sera d’ailleurs vraisemblablement pas la dernière fois qu’un grand déballage a lieu.The notion of mental health had also appeared during the interview given by Harry and Meghan in Oprah Winfrey.It was then about Meghan and his helplessness to find advice to support him in his dismay, in the golden prison of the palace.The "firm" would have refused her the psychological help she needed while she was nourishing suicidal thoughts.Psy balance would be a key to the character of Harry, says Marc Roche."After his recent statements and other points, many make this observation today: the prince obviously has a mental problem.We keep talking about it in the media and elsewhere.It’s a fashionable concept today but here it seems to take full meaning.In any case, this aspect does not surprise the British besides because we know that Harry was traumatized by the death of his mother.He is a sensitive boy, more than his older brother who was formatted by his grandmother to never let his feelings filter publicly.It is difficult to see William talking to a shrink.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

La « santé mentale»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» et le bien-être psychologique et émotionnel sont par ailleurs au centre de la nouvelle série documentaire lancée par Harry et Oprah Winfrey sur Apple TV.In The Me You Can’t See (the me that you cannot see), Harry talks about his childhood, evokes his vulnerability, some heartbreaking flashbacks of the funeral of Lady Diana, his helplessness to protect her. Egalement au programme, les états d’âme du « celebrity chef»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» Rashad Armstead, de la boxeuse poids léger Ginny Fuchs, ou les traumatismes de Lady Gaga.

Si l’intégrité des participants n’est pas à mettre en cause, la superficialité de certains thèmes, liés arfois à l’activisme de « A list celebrities»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»», a été dénoncée comme étant a priori plutôt éloignée des préoccupations du tout venant.Likewise, the subjects, overflown, discussed in the format of the confession, do not provide concrete avenues or specific advice for imperative psychic issues to be dealt with within reasonable deadlines.The rules of show business, even with a humanitarian vocation, are queens.And probably is that also the beginning of a long series.

"He studied in Eton and was in the army. C’est la base pour les Windsor»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

A childhood broken by the brutal disappearance of his mother, associated with these paparazzi hordes.And an experience which, in addition to a stay on the front in Afghan terrain, and, some parts of strip poker in Vegas may seem thin in terms of experience, and can explain that he has discovered California, the entertainment and a lifestyleBobo with glitter in the eyes.We detest, in fact, in Harry which is furiously like educational gaps, which appears as a deficit of "real life"»»»»»»»».Gaps perhaps also linked to a rather formatted training precisely, and to a course that does not seem hyper pushed.A university background or at least more specific professional training than the army could have helped it to bounce back."He still studied at Eton college, even if he was a little lagging behind and that he has completed his exams in incredible conditions.He also made the army.It must be enough in principle if, as was the case for William, we instilled you the importance of duty by reminding you that you will be king one day.Harry was completely abandoned.The queen, aunts and uncles only had eyes for William and Harry has always been abandoned.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Victime indirecte de la « light monarchy»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

His childhood was therefore neglected, sloppy, for reasons specific to the institution among other things.But Marc Roche refuses to talk about an education error here."It is," he says, the system that wants this."We obviously think of other cadets of European royal families, those whose roles are between two waters, unlikely to reign one day but not far enough than to have acquired any freedom of action. Leur rôle n’est pas écrit dans la « Constitution»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» du Royaume-Uni (un ensemble de règles constitutionnelles non codifiées issues de la loi, de la jurisprudence, d’usages constitutionnels.) Par ailleurs un rôle défini noir sur blanc irait à l’encontre sans doute du « resserrement»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» des effectifs royaux qui est de mise dans la monarchie britannique comme dans d’autres monarchies européennes.

Lire aussi > Elizabeth II et la famille royale sur la BBC juste avant l’interview de Meghan et Harry chez OprahElizabeth II a réduit la voilure, comme le veut aujourd’hui l’acceptation d’une monarchie plus ancrée dans son temps. “Dans la royauté britannique, il n’y a pas de place pour quiconque est en-dehors des deux ou trois premières places dans l’ordre de succession»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»», confirme Marc Roche."The royal family is brought back to the Queen, Charles and William.It’s a “light monarchy»».The Scandinavians had it before the British.This measure was also essential.Given the age of the queen, there were fifty-two having right.Under pressure from public opinion, it was necessary to bring order.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

“Diana ? Son personnage est périphérique»»

Marc Roche sur « le cas Harry »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» : « Meghan Markle remplissait toutes les cases pour se faire haïr des tabloïds»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Diana's genetic and societal heritage seems naturally essential when we talk about Harry.Has the impact of the maternal drama on the prince's experience was overestimated?"As Penny Junor (*), biographer of Prince Charles notably noted, Harry is not the only child in the world to have lost his young mother.He is not the only one either to have known the difficulties of a troubled youth, nor the only one to come from divorced parents.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Lire aussi > Princesse Diana : La BBC enquête sur son interview explosive de 1995

The legend Diana continues naturally in memories and continues to make a recipe in the form of series, films, or documentaries, but the reflection of the princess of Wales is actually, comments Marc Roche, much less present than we imagine inBritish minds.“Diana is completely forgotten in this country.It’s a peripheral character.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»L’accident qui lui a coûté la vie a contribué à ériger le mythe."I always said that Diana was an epiphenomenon that death deified.But even after his disappearance and the bound trauma, the population has remained attached to the royal family, and to the queen as evidenced by the success of her diamond jubilee in 2012.Lady Di fans have aged, they are no longer very numerous.They are the readers of the popular press of course, but it also has among its faithful great supporters of the monarchy.Lady Di was a bit like Meghan.She adopted not very popular causes, at least in her time: AIDS, the hand stretched for homosexuals, the third world help, anti-personnel mines, the world of fashion, friendship with Elton John ... We wereFar from the concerns of the monarchist people.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Meghan, demolished by the tabloid press

"Harry dynamite his family," tweeted, after the interview given by Harry and Meghan to Oprah Winfrey, the Secretary of State for the Pacific, Zac Goldsmith, close to Boris Johnson.The influence of his wife, Meghan, more mature, broken to the imperatives of the show biz, is indisputable according to many observers.The actress is also a businesswoman who does not back down before the projects. Elle doit publier le 8 juin un livre pour enfants, « The Bench»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»», illustré par Christian Robinson, et dans lequel elle évoque le lien entre un fils et son père.She was inspired by Prince Harry and their son Archie.An American who worked for the New York Magazine and for Rolling Stone accuses him of being inspired by "The Boy On The Bench", born from the collaboration of Corrine Averiss and Gabriel Alborolo and published in 2018.On the cover, we see a boy sitting on a bench with his father.But the author of this work would be mounted in the niche to defend Meghan, dismantling the idea of plagiarism and pointing that the two themes were very different.Meghan had to face the systematic deconstruction of his remarks in the interview with Oprah Winfrey.Piers Morgan, English presenter, popular and conservative, did not fail to profusely emphasize the inaccuracies of his words, questioning most of his assertions (as the fact that Harry and she would have married "in secret" before theOfficial D -Day).His burst attacks also caused his fanfare departure from the “Good Morning Britain»» show on ITV."In reality", underlines Marc Roche, "Piers Morgan only reflects popular opinion.»»

« Elle remplissait toutes les cases pour se faire haïr»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

What to say therefore the real role of the press, notably Tabloid, very powerful in the United Kingdom, and who vilified Harry's wife? "The British popular press represents five million copies every day.She has always made her greasy cows of the morals of the Royals.Its success is linked to England, quite voyeuristic and where the protection of privacy is not the same as in Belgium.It is a country very mainly in favor of the royal institution which is above the fray and the popular press is the best interface between monarchy and people.And the sex slippages of the Windsor have paper sells.These media have never attacked the queen and prince Philip because they represented the state but they were of an unimaginable cruelty in the Charles and Diana case, Camilla against Kate at one point, and are certainly anti-meghan.It's a right press.Meghan filled all the boxes to be hated. Non pas parce qu’elle est « métissée»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» (un terme qu’on n’utilise d’ailleurs plus en Grande-Bretagne) car cette presse se vend énormément aussi dans les communautés ethniques, mais parce qu’elle est Américaine, divorcée et surtout « woke»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» (terme hype qui désigne des personnalités « en éveil»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»», qui s’érigent contre les injustices).WOKE, it doesn't happen ... "»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Lire aussi > « Duchesse délirante»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» : Meghan Markle aurait menti près de 17 fois lors de son interview polémique

Did the tabloids, who regularly descend it into flames, exaggerate the weight of this self-made business woman?"The palace has in any case underestimated at the start the influence that the older, more determined in career, more fine and more cosmopolitan than the prince could have thanks to his links with the entertainment in particular.And we have underestimated the effect it could have on a troubled personality, weaker, psychologically in crisis and devoid of any professional ambition.To put it clearly, Harry didn't know what to do with his life.This is what was minimized, with the important consequences that we know.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

« Il n’y a rien de glamour à baptiser des navires»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Meghan would have poorly assessed the requirements of the function.Perceiving only the flattering reflections of a privileged post, a position which she imagined as undoubtedly influential, and archi-Protégée. « Son erreur fondamentale»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»», poursuit Marc Roche, « a été de ne pas voir que les fastes de la Cour, cette vie sous cloche dorée, avec sécurité, domestiques et impact médiatique, avaient un verso. Ce verso qu’elle n’a pas vu venir, ce sont les charges royales, les fonctions de représentation qui, particulièrement pour les membres « inférieurs»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» de la famille royale, sont très ennuyeuses.There is nothing glamorous to baptize ships, to visit regiments, to cut ribbons.Now that's the ABC of the monarchy.Meghan wanted butter and butter money.As the queen pointed out: you cannot be a member of the royal family half-time.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Accusations de racisme ? Charles et William, « très supporters de la société multiculturelle»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

In their March interview on CBS, the Meghan-Harry couple spoke of overwhelming media pressure, as well as the British press racism. « Les retombées de l’émission, vue par 17 millions d’Américains puis par 11 millions de téléspectateurs au Royaume-Uni, se feront sentir à travers les générations, comme pour celle de Diana en 1995»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»», note alors Andrew Morton, biographe de Lady Di.They mentioned exchanges within the royal family on the skin color that their son Archie would have, before his birth.Harry had clarified that these racist comments were neither the fact of the queen nor of Prince Philip. La réponse du Palais fut éminemment diplomatique et un brin condescendante : « Toute la famille est attristée d’apprendre à quel point ces dernières années ont été difficiles pour Harry et Meghan»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»», soulignant que le couple et leur fils, Archie, « seront toujours des membres de la famille très aimés»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»».

Si la princesse Anne a été citée en tant qu’auteure « potentielle»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» de ces propos dégradants.Marc Roche does not comment on this point. « Harry n’a jamais donné de nom»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»», souligne-t-il."A majority of the public believes that Meghan invented this point.On the other hand, the British royal family is less racist than the Middle Briton.Charles and William have always been very enlightened and very supporters of multicultural society via their philanthropic actions.Harry also has no lesson to give.Let us recall the episode where he had declined to a Nazi disguise. Et le fait qu’il a traité de « Paki»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»», une insulte profonde en Grande-Bretagne, un de ses officiers issus de l’immigration du sous-continent indien…»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Lire aussi > Décès du prince Philip : La BBC se fait incendier par les Britanniques pour sa couverture hors-norme

Ce trait peut rappeler, dans son inconséquence, sa légèreté, sa rudesse aussi, certaines réflexions dont le prince Philip était coutumier, lui qui fit régulièrement les choux gras des médias pour des sorties lourdingues et d’une « political incorrectness»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» à décorner les bœufs."Prince Philip was a man of colonialism.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» Un homme éduqué à la dure, isolé de sa famille."But he was no more racist than other members of the royal family.As for Harry he began to speak as the soldiers speak.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»Les faits d’armes de Harry, dont se délecte le lectorat des tabloïds depuis des lustres deviennent purement verbaux.A logorrhea that seems inexhaustible."The latest adventures, this exit in which Harry blamed the education received from his father and, indirectly criticized Elizabeth II and Prince Philip for the way they raised royal children, set fire to the powder.Because first Elizabeth II, widow, is untouchable.She is considered vulnerable due to the death of her husband after 73 years of union.She is 95 years old and is at the height of her popularity.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

« La ‘réconciliation’ aux funérailles : une piètre opération de com»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

It is in priority the multiplication of Harry diatribes which would have mainly struck certain mentalities.These cascading media outings that he seems to be repayed.

"We thought that after unpacking with Oprah Winfrey, the reconciled reconciliation laws of the funeral and discussions with his father had a little normalized the relationship but it was only a poor public relations of the palace, this reconciliation wasknock.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»Dans le cortège pédestre suivant le cercueil, les princes Harry et William étaient séparés par leur cousin Peter Phillips, ce qui avait, en amont, alimenté des spéculations sur des tensions entre les frères. L’économiste et chroniqueur royal qualifie cette séparation téléguidée de « ridicule»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»."She had aroused the negative press reactions upstream, including royalist.So we had to react.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Pour y répondre, le “Palais»», via son équipe de communication, a prévu un échange entre les deux frères. Mais le « Palais»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»», dénonce Marc Roche, s’y est mal pris. « Le ‘Palais’, ce sont en fait les collaborateurs de la reine, des princes Charles et William qui ont tous des “cours»» différentes. Ces équipes agissent donc sur ordre des “royals»». C’est un monde “top down»», très hiérarchisé.There is no question of the slightest indiscretion of the palace is done without the explicit approval of the monarch, the heir to the throne, or the second.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»Marc Roche le dit encore : cet échange relevait de la « réconciliation de boulevard»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»». C’est, insiste-t-il, « venu de la reine qui les a contraints à parler»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»». Un mauvais choix en termes de com, que la presse a mis, à tort, sur le compte de Kate Middleton, la présentant comme « l’orfèvre»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» d’un rapprochement fraternel. « Cette interprétation vient du fait que Kate s’est éloignée de William et Harry pour les laisser « dialoguer»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»». C’était en fait une piètre chorégraphie autour d’un échange entre les frères dont on ignore la teneur mais qui était vraisemblablement de pure forme…»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»Il est prévu que Harry revienne en juillet au Royaume-Uni pour l’inauguration d’une statue de Lady Di.“This ceremony was planned for a long time as a gesture of reconciliation.It had been announced long before Prince Philip's funeral.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» On apprenait récemment que les deux frères feraient des discours séparément.

« Il ne colle pas à la vulgate de la royauté»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Harry joins certain votes of course.He divides while keeping, across the Atlantic in particular, a great notoriety and a certain potential sympathy.In Great Britain, on the other hand, his profile and that of Meghan accuse a fall in popularity."It causes both a positive reaction, this poor guy who suffered, and negative of course.In British high society, you never show its feelings.He sticks at the time by engaging as he did, but he does not stick at all to the vulgate of royalty.In addition, Harry's problem, others knew him before him: Andrew, Anne, the Duke of Windsor, Margaret, Lord Mountbatten, and even the Queen Mother ... What to do with this plethoric family where therehas no place for everyone.It is the cruelty of the system based on the primogeniture of age.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Hipster of Silicon Valley

The Tussauds Museum in London was recently reopened its doors. Rappelons, pour l’anecdote, que le couple Meghan Harry, qui a quitté ses fonctions de « senior membres of the royal family»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» après son installation en Amérique du Nord y a été déplacé de la section « House of Windsor»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» à celle des « Awards Party»», peuplée entre autres de figures du 7e Art.Harry, the royal offspring, looking like hipster in the west coast, catapulted at the post of senior executive of a Californian start-up, takes pleasure in having cool. En « woke»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» sacrément éclairé, pour reprendre cette expression consacrée.He now displays the image of the new wave father, child on his stomach and post grungy hat. Quelles sont les limites de son action, de sa production ? Que peut il faire en termes de soutien aux charities ? Jusqu’où peut-il monnayer ses infos « royales»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»», fussent-elles de simples « sensations»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» ?« Il semble construire sa carrière autour de docus liés de près aux secrets de la famille royale»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»», confirme Marc Roche, « mais il faut se souvenir évidemment que Harry ne fait pas partie du cercle premier, contrairement à Charles ou William. Il peut donc relayer des rumeurs, colporter des ragots, évoquer des expériences personnelles…»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Sa propension à se « confier»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» en utilisant les médias, dont il ne se lasse pas par ailleurs de dénoncer la nocivité, semble avoir peu de limites.The weapon is however double -edged.To excel in this job, it is necessary to handle communication with finesse.An art consumed that Harry only masters in instinct, advised by an American entourage, and by his wife who is more aware of the rules in progress in the entertainment.Public opinion has already returned against him."The type of journey in which Harry is committed has a snowball effect.We can expect increasingly controversial revelations since it is completely cut off from British reality and taken in this kind of Hollywood Culture of celebrities.We are at a point of no return.The monarchy has an asset-key that will hurt: the possibility of withdrawing their title of Duke and Duchess of Sussex to which they hold a lot and which was granted to them at marriage.Beyond that, their fate strangely resembles that of the Duke and the Duchess of Windsor, a royal who married a divorced American.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

If, in the long term, the couple had to separate, could it encourage a reintegration of Harry in his official princely functions, imagining that he expresses the wish one day?"The only scenario in which reconciliation with his father and brother is possible, would be within the framework of a divorce with Meghan.He should make amends honorable.He should also put all this rebellion on the account of his ex-wife and the fragility of his mental health.He would then be welcomed as a hero but I don't believe in this scenario at all.Because marriage seems solid and because Harry, in his own psychic fragility and perhaps under pressure from his wife, remains in a logic of confrontation.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

« Une affaire institutionnelle et familiale»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Between unpacking in high places and Shakespearean drama, the Harry affair nourishes the press, even more than the so -called Andrew affair, fogged in the eddies of the Epstein scandal."The Andrew affair is a criminal affair.It is associated with its links with a pedophile, with fine parts and the fact that the FBI wants to question the prince.The Meghan-Harry affair is both institutional and family. Institutionnelle car elle secoue la monarchie au cœur dans son identité, et familiale car c’est les Borgia ou les Rougon-Macquart de Zola, des clans qui s’entre-déchirent autour de l’amour, du sexe, du pouvoir…»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Mais ceci ne remet pas en cause, jusqu’à nouvel ordre, la viabilité et l’apparente résistance de la monarchie, entre « anachronisme»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» et business familial. C’est un « bon rapport qualité prix»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» qui la sauve, indique Marc Roche en gros.Just as what she embodies in terms of past and unity, as the world recalled.A little of all this in reality. Reste à imaginer comment l’histoire britannique évaluera le couple qui a voulu “briser le cycle»».“Between 50 and 60 % of people support the monarchy in Great Britain but when you look closely, there are gaps between generations.The main supporters of the monarchy are older.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»Elizabeth II a manqué, dit-on, une occasion en or d’actualiser le blason, de faire sinon un reset, du moins un update du meilleur goût."Meghan had to allow him to hang a new green generation, feminist, anti -racist on the left but it did not take.A generation problem no doubt.Then Meghan had to anchor the monarchy with ethnic minorities, to which Charles and William are attached to their charity and anti-racism movements.But the Meghan card failed.Its popularity rating as well as that of Harry fell in the polls.In addition to these adventures, we have witnessed in recent months, probably due to the pandemic, a rise in monarchical feeling.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Article published in Paris Match Belgium on 05/20/21

(*) Marc Roche is a columnist in the evening and at point, director of financial documentaries, author and specialist in the British monarchy. Son dernier ouvrage dans le domaine : “Elle ne voulait pas être reine»», éd.Albin Michel, 2018.